CopperString Project (previous)
Project overview*
| EIS status | 'Significant project' declaration repealed by Coordinator-General. | 
| Description | A 1028 km alternating current transmission line with the capacity to transfer 400-500 megawatts of electricity to and from the North West Queensland electricity supply system and the National Electricity Market. | 
| Proponent | CopperString Pty Ltd (a special purpose vehicle jointly established by Leighton Contractors Ltd and CuString Pty Ltd). | 
| Location/s | The transmission line would run from a new substation near Woodstock, south of Townsville, to a new substation south west of Cloncurry. The line would then diverge west to Mount Isa and to major energy users in the North West Queensland Minerals Province. | 
| Local government/s | 
            
  | 
    
| Key features | 
            
  | 
    
* Project information supplied by proponent and subject to change.
Environmental impact statement (EIS) process
| Date | Activity | 
|---|---|
| 25 September 2012 | 'Significant project' declaration repealed by Coordinator-General. | 
| 26 September 2011 to 24 October 2011  | 
            Public consultation on supplementary EIS (SEIS).
                
  | 
        
| 17 June 2011 | Review of Corridor Route Selection Report ( | 
        
| 11 December 2010 to 7 February 2011  | 
            Public consultation on EIS
                
  | 
        
| 29 October 2010 | Terms of reference for EIS ( | 
        
| 4 September 2010 to 4 October 2010  | 
            Public consultation on draft terms of reference for EIS. | 
| 19 August 2010 | Project deemed a controlled action by Commonwealth Minister for the Environment.
            
                 | 
        
| 19 July 2010 | Project referred to Commonwealth Minister for the Environment. | 
| 18 June 2010 | Gazettal of 'significant project' declaration ( | 
        
| 17 May 2010 | Application, including initial advice statement ( | 
        
Read more about the EIS process.
Review of route selection
During public consultation on the EIS, a number of landholders objected to the alignment of a 100-kilometre section of the transmission-line route.
The section - which came to be known as the Costello to Landsberg Alignment - lies between the properties of PM Costello and RG & JM Landsberg.
Broadly, the landholders were concerned that:
- the transmission-line route was incompatible with existing and envisaged agricultural land uses
 - they were not properly consulted on the alignment of the route
 
In response, the Coordinator-General ordered a review of the route selection process and methodology.
Consultants Golder Associates conducted the review, which looked at:
- terms of reference for the EIS
 - route selection process and methodology, including a comparison with the process and methodology recently used by Powerlink Queensland to select a transmission-line route
 - transmission line's potential impacts on land-use practices
 - consultation conducted during the route selection process.
 
The review report concluded that:
- the route selection report compiled by consultants Resource and Land Management Services could have been structured more clearly
 - overall, the route selection process and methodology were valid, using reasonable criteria for route selection
 - extensive consultation was undertaken, including with all the landholders along the Costello to Landsberg Alignment.
 
Download report
Last updated: 09 Nov 2021